Tip #44: Criticism, Feedback and Commentary

 

I am in a state of immense gratitude as I write this post. Why? Today I read an excellent review of one of my novels by Marian L. Thorpe (excellently reviewed, not reviewed as excellent). It led to an Alice In Wonderland rabbit-hole of surprises for me.

Surprise #1: the novel tried to hold its own, but came away with injuries.

Surprise #2: I did not break anything after reading it.

The latter was unexpected and, if you are a writer, you surely understand why. When you read the first uncomplimentary reviews of your writing, like me prior to the review in question, you probably turned crimson with rage.

A freshly-penned piece of writing feels precious (if not quite like the writer’s own child). The initial attitude of its creator is of the protective mother or father lion defending her/his cub.

Angry lion
“Who called Autobiography of a Lonely Lion ‘amateurish’?”

This is why you need to seek out as much criticism or feedback as possible, from any available source. Better to have the critique of a hundred amateurs than one expert’s opinion. Accustom yourself to the negative in order to remove its sting and enable you to accept it as valid.

I’m not saying a poor review will one day breeze past like the scent of fresh roses on the morning breeze. It still packs a punch, but you are less likely to react with a few shots of your own.

For me, it was an unintentional progression. I found myself looking at a negative review and not seeing red. Instead I saw an opportunity. Here was feedback which could be used to my advantage!

‘Negative’ is an interesting word. It means the opposite of something, an inversion like the colours on a film negative. If you turn your criticism around it becomes a roadmap of how to improve your writing.

Here is something you do not expect to hear from a writer. The critic is always right.

Your reviewer tells you your scenery is bland. You might have created a detailed, vibrant and unique backdrop for your story, but is it perfect? In this sense, your reviewer is absolutely right to point out that you have not yet achieved perfection. If something can be improved, why not do so?

I had long suspected my writing was falling flat somewhere. Now I have a few ideas about where to make improvements.

I could tell you to approach criticism in a calm and detached manner, but how likely is that? Better still, go hunting for reviews in the hope that negative feedback will appear. Without it a writer is groping blindly for ways to improve, without knowing where things went wrong.

Thanks again to Marian L. Thorpe! Honesty is a most appreciated gift.

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “Tip #44: Criticism, Feedback and Commentary

  1. My problem is when reviews tell me what they would have liked to see I always want to hit that unpublish button and fix the piece. I’m too much of a people pleaser I try to apply criticism on a go forward basis

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I wish all writers could develop this attitude! I like that you look at critique as a positive. Critique is NOT the same as criticism. If a writer cannot accept honest feedback, then why ask for reviews? Just throw your writing out there and say to hell with what people think. Or better yet, write for yourself and don’t ask others to read it at all. For example, I know the people in my writing group I can be honest with, and the ones who just want their ego stroked. Good for you, Joe!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. As the reviewer in question I’m glad you see the positive. As a indie writer myself, I’ve had my share of reviews that didn’t like my work, and in a well-written review I’ve always learned something: sometimes it’s about something that really does need improvement, and sometimes it’s just that no-one is going to like everything, and even my favourite writers – both indie and mainstream – have their share of readers who just don’t like their style. I’d like to think of indie writers and indie-book reviewers as one big writing group, working together cooperatively to everyone’s benefit, and that’s how I approach my reviewing and editorial work. I appreciate your post today.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. What an awful post. It gave me diabetes.

    But jokes aside, I have always been thick-skinned. That I have always surrounded myself with barbed characters may have something to do with this.

    Too many writers think of their works as children, and too many writers think that their children are faultless. It upsets me that I have a friend who is one such character and takes any criticism about his writing as jealousy or “you just don’t understand the genre.”

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s